More Recipes…
Award

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner


 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe with Bloglines
Add to Google
Add to My AOL
Chefs Blogs
Add to Technorati Favorites
store Seriously Useful is a selection of kitchen tools from Amazon that I can't cook without.
Archives

Ideology

Ideology

Chips

I just filled out a survey directed to professional cooks/chefs. For the most part it was fine, although there were some stupid questions such as:

“What’s your favorite spice?” — Depends on what I’m cooking. And do herbs count as a ‘spice,’ and what about flavorings such as lemon or capers?

“What’s your signature dish?” — Everything I associate my name with. What? You want me to pick a favorite child?

But there was one question I really liked: “What do you think about molecular gastronomy in terms of introducing chemical elements into dish preparation?”

This is a great question — not least because of the ignorance it presumes. After all, everything is composed of chemicals — salt is sodium chloride (a combination of two elements that are individually poisonous to humans) — MSG (mono-sodium glutamate) occurs naturally in soy sauce, tomatoes, and Parmigiano Reggiano. Recently an article in the Times On Line wondered if E! Bulli chef Ferran Adria was “poisoning” his customers. A German food critic, Jörg Zipprick, had asserted that:

“These colorants, gelling agents, emulsifiers, acidifiers and taste enhancers that Adria has introduced massively into his dishes to obtain extraordinary textures, tastes and sensations do not have a neutral impact on health,” says Zipprick, adding that some have a laxative effect.

Jeez! Three glasses of iced tea gives me the runs. So does too much orange juice. And drinking too much water causes me to urinate frequently.

I understand Zipprick’s point, the random addition of ingredients to create an affect when the effects on our bodies isn’t well known is a bad idea. I agree completely with that thesis. I minimize the amount of processed food I consume with the presumption that by doing so I minimize the ill-effects of added chemicals on my body — not that I come even close to considering my body a temple: It’s more like a Mayan pyramid swallowed by jungle.

Nevertheless, point taken. However, that distinctive bitter note we like so much in almonds? Cyanide — prussic acid. And the bitterness in winter greens? The same. Cabbages and onions contain sulfur — yet another element and chemical. Everything except energy is composed of chemicals even water is hydrogen dioxide.

If the chemicals are benign in the quantities used then I have no objection. I personally prefer adding anchovy paste to my tomato sauce rather than pure MSG, but I prefer adding MSG to my chicken soup to anchovy paste. I also prefer that my food look like food and I’m no more a fan of oyster foam than boneless, skinless chicken breasts. But that’s my preference.

But whatever your no-doubt thoughtful preferences about local versus imported food, organic versus conventional food. Cooking should never be about ideology, it should always be about flavor. Think I’ll have a Quarter-pounder and fries for supper tonight — chemicals and all.

Technorati: | | |

4 Responses to “Ideology”

  • Susan:

    Like my father used to say…”everything’s organic if you go back far enough” (he was kidding…) Enjoyed the post…

  • CJ:

    The whole “molecular gastronomy” is over-hyped and over blown. It’s meant to elevate the chef’s creation and set them apart from those of us who “don’t understand” the elemental components of a dish.

    Oh please. It’s not lost on me. It’s just that it’s hard for me to take it seriously,; like the new-ish “foams” trend. It’s just silly. Besides, if I’m paying up the wazoo for a meal in a fancy restaurant, the only foam I want is whipped cream, on my dessert.

    Instead of waxing poetically about molecular gatronomy, ask this- (The important food questions.) “Does it taste good? Is it balanced? Do you enjoy the texture?

    I stand shoulder to shouder with you Kevin and appreciate your humor in this piece.

    And I feel much better now that I’ve vented. *sigh*

    Now please pass the salt……

  • mickey:

    Very clever writing. I feel Molecular gastronomy is a trend in much the same way nouvelle cuisine was in the 1980′s-I’m old enough to remember the genesis. It will be around for awhile and the most remarkable aspects of it will become part of the larger batterie de cuisine and the rest will fade away.

  • Kevin:

    Susan,
    I like your father’s comment.

    CJ,
    I’d love to try one of those “molecular” meals once, just for the hell of it.

    Mickey,
    I think you’re right.

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree


Disclaimer: Most quantities in recipes are approximate. Adjust as needed according to your taste and experience. Unless otherwise specified, eggs are large and butter is unsalted.